Modular Monoliths vs. Microservices

In the software architecture world, monoliths and microservices represent two fundamentally different approaches to structuring applications. While monoliths have been around for quite some time, the shift towards microservices represents a modern trend. But what if you could merge the best of both worlds? Enter modular monoliths, a design pattern that combines the simplicity of monoliths with the flexibility of microservices.

What is a Modular Monolith?

A modular monolith is a software design pattern that provides an alternative to the traditional monolithic and microservices architecture. It can be seen as a middle ground - a monolithic application, but with a clear emphasis on modularity. The goal is to achieve low coupling between different parts of the system (modules), and high cohesion within each module. The idea is that these modules should be interchangeable and independent but still contribute to a single, unified application.

In a Spring Boot project, a modular monolith might involve structuring your application into separate Spring Boot projects, each representing a different domain within your application. Each project/module can then be developed, and tested independently, while still being part of a larger, unified application.

What are Microservices?

Microservices, on the other hand, are an architectural style where an application is composed of small, independent processes communicating with each other using language-agnostic APIs. These services are small and perform a single function. They can be deployed, upgraded, scaled, and restarted independently.

A typical Spring Boot microservice would be a standalone application, often packed as a container, that performs a specific task. It communicates with other microservices through well-defined APIs, typically over HTTP/REST or asynchronous messaging.

Comparing Modular Monoliths and Microservices

Now that we have an understanding of what these two architectures are let's compare them.


When it comes to complexity, modular monoliths are often simpler than microservices. While microservices introduce the benefits of separation and isolation, they also introduce complexities such as inter-service communication, data consistency, and distributed systems' challenges.

Modular monoliths, on the other hand, are simpler and easier to manage as they are essentially one application. The emphasis on modularity ensures that parts of the system can be separated, reducing the complexity within each module.

Development and Deployment

With microservices, you can use different technology stacks for different services based on their requirements. This allows teams to use the best tools for the tasks at hand. In contrast, in a modular monolith, you are often tied to a single technology stack due to the unified nature of the application.

Microservices can also be scaled independently based on demand, while with a modular monolith, the entire application usually has to be scaled.

Data Consistency

Data consistency can be a challenge with microservices due to their distributed nature. Ensuring that data is consistent across all services often involves complex coordination, eventual consistency, or distributed transactions.

Modular monoliths typically share a single database, which makes transactions and data consistency easier to manage. However, this also introduces tight coupling around the database, which can limit the flexibility of individual modules.

When to Choose Which?

Deciding between a modular monolith and a microservice architecture for your Spring Boot project comes down to your project's specific needs and the trade-offs you are willing to accept.

You might favor a modular monolith if:

  1. Your team is small, and the domain complexity is manageable.

  2. You prefer simplicity over the complexity of a distributed system.

  3. You need strong consistency guarantees, and the business logic is transaction-heavy.

On the other hand, a microservice architecture might be a better choice if:

  1. Your application has distinct components that require different technology stacks.

  2. You need to scale different parts of your system independently.

  3. Your team structure aligns with the microservices model, i.e., you have independent teams that can own and operate each service.

Remember, the choice between a modular monolith and microservices is not a binary one. You can start with a modular monolith and gradually move to a microservice architecture as your system grows and evolves. The key is to understand the trade-offs involved and make an informed decision that best suits your project's requirements.

Did you find this article valuable?

Support Adrian Kodja by becoming a sponsor. Any amount is appreciated!